Blame the Game, Not the Players
Fleeting- Référence externe :
- Référence externe : https://towardsdatascience.com/blame-the-game-not-the-player-467e33d8044b
- voir,
Les acteurs du système s’adaptent aux mécanisme incitatifs du système. On peut regretter que leur comportement ne suis pas des règles morales, mais c’est ce qu’on est en droit d’attendre des incitations.
One of the key insights from Game Theory is that games can be intentionally designed such that they have ‘good’ equilibria. The field of Mechanism Design (or Inverse Game Theory), which lies within the intersection of Economics and Game Theory, deals with this question
— https://towardsdatascience.com/blame-the-game-not-the-player-467e33d8044b
Some games simply have bad outcomes because of the architecture of the game, not because of the players. G
— https://towardsdatascience.com/blame-the-game-not-the-player-467e33d8044b
Mechanism Design (or Inverse Game theory) on the other hand helps us re-design these problems such that the Nash equilibrium represents a better outcome for everyone involved.
— https://towardsdatascience.com/blame-the-game-not-the-player-467e33d8044b
Notes pointant ici
- cohérence, congruence
- crise de l’€ part 06
- Hanlon’s razor
- How to Future-Proof Your Business in a Fast-Changing World. A Chat with Brian Robertson
- is tdd possible in companies?
- Main Street vs Wall Street : l’Affaire GameStop
- micro promesses vs macro promesses
- people needing to do pull requests may hide an organisational issue
- personal problem vs systemic problem fallacy
- pourquoi les gens continuent à l’appeller scrum ? (blog)
- problème interne et externe
- rhétorique de la contemplation
- should I be a team player or a goal player?
- vivre bien, c’est changer les choses ou les accepter
- You’re About to Make a Terrible Mistake!
- éduquer les enfants en plus de changer les choses